Site icon House Craftsman

Assessing recreation services for heritage resources in scenic areas based on behavioral semantic perspective

Assessing recreation services for heritage resources in scenic areas based on behavioral semantic perspective
  • Sun, X., Liu, H., Liao, C., Nong, H. & Yang, P. Understanding recreational ecosystem service supply-demand mismatch and social groups’ preferences: Implications for urban–rural planning. Landsc. Urban Plan. 241, 104903 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghasemi, M., Charrahy, Z. & González-García, A. Mapping cultural ecosystem services provision: An integrated model of recreation and ecotourism opportunities. Land Use Policy 131, 106732 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yousaf, A., Amin, I. & Santos, J. A. C. Tourists’ Motivations to Travel: a Theoretical Perspective on the Existing Literature. Tour. hosp. manag. 24, 197–211 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nian, S., Bao, J., Chen, Y., Zhang, X. & Chen, Y. How does the tourist experience affect the conservation of World Heritage Sites via the stimulus‒organism‒response model? Mount Sanqingshan National Park, China. npj Herit. Sci. 13, 21 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunkel, A. Visualizing the perceived environment using crowdsourced photo geodata. Landsc. Urban Plan. 142, 173–186 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beijing Jinghe Cultural Tourism Development Institute. China’s Ministry of Culture and Tourism’s research report. (Ministry of Culture and Tourism of the People’s Republic of China, 2019).

  • Standard for scenic and historic areas classification. (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China, 2008).

  • Liu, J. et al. Facilitating urban tourism governance with crowdsourced big data: A framework based on Shenzhen and Jiangmen, China. Int. J. Appl. Earth Observation Geoinf. 124, 103509 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, R., Ann Diehl, J., Zhang, R. & Wang, H. Spatial equity of urban parks from the perspective of recreational opportunities and recreational environment quality: A case study in Singapore. Landsc. Urban Plan. 247, 105065 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, L. et al. Exploring the evolution of coupled natural-cultural ecosystem services and their geographically scaled driven modeling in a coastal city of Southeast China. J. Environ. Manag. 361, 121265 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, J. & Turner, M. G. Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 12149–12154 (2013).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, A. B., Olsen, S. B. & Lundhede, T. An economic valuation of the recreational benefits associated with nature-based forest management practices. Landsc. Urban Plan. 80, 63–71 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, C. M. & Cook, A. The recreational value of Lake McKenzie, Fraser Island: An application of the travel cost method. Tour. Manag. 29, 1197–1205 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, S. S. K. et al. Mapping recreation as an ecosystem service: Considering scale, interregional differences and the influence of physical attributes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 175, 149–160 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, R.-Z. et al. Spatio-temporal characteristics of cultural ecosystem services and their relations to landscape factors in Hangzhou Xixi National Wetland Park, China. Ecol. Indic. 154, 110910 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, W., Zhang, Z., Zhang, H. & Tovuudorj, R. Integrating spatial patterns and driving factors of cultural ecosystem services into territorial spatial governance: A case study of the Horqin Sandy Land with multi-ethnic settlements. Habitat Int. 148, 103093 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, A. et al. Social media reveal that charismatic species are not the main attractor of ecotourists to sub-Saharan protected areas. Sci. Rep. 7, 763 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. Rethinking the sociology of tourism. Ann. Tour. Res. 6, 18–35 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y., Shao, Y. & Chan, E. H. W. Co-visitation network in tourism-driven peri-urban area based on social media analytics: A case study in Shenzhen, China. Landsc. Urban Plan. 204, 103934 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Teles da Mota, V. & Pickering, C. Using social media to assess nature-based tourism: Current research and future trends. J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour. 30, 100295 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, T. et al. Unveiling interprovincial geographic patterns of 5A-level tourism cultural ecosystem service flows and tourist preferences in China’s metacoupled systems. Appl. Geogr. 172, 103432 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. & Bicocchi, N. Crowd-Sourcing Information Dissemination Based on Spatial Behavior and Social Networks. Mob. Inf. Syst. 2021, 6652740 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaragozí, B., Trilles, S. & Gutiérrez, A. Passive Mobile Data for Studying Seasonal Tourism Mobilities: An Application in a Mediterranean Coastal Destination. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 10, 98 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijles, E. W., de Bakker, M., Groote, P. D. & Barske, R. Analysing hiker movement patterns using GPS data: Implications for park management. Computers, Environ. Urban Syst. 47, 44–57 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Havinga, I., Marcos, D., Bogaart, P. W., Hein, L. & Tuia, D. Social media and deep learning capture the aesthetic quality of the landscape. Sci. Rep. 11, 20000 (2021).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., Seo, B., Koellner, T. & Lautenbach, S. Mapping cultural ecosystem services 2.0 – Potential and shortcomings from unlabeled crowd sourced images. Ecol. Indic. 96, 505–515 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • van Weerdenburg, D., Scheider, S., Adams, B., Spierings, B. & van der Zee, E. Where to go and what to do: Extracting leisure activity potentials from Web data on urban space. Computers, Environ. Urban Syst. 73, 143–156 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bi, X., Gan, X., Jiang, Z., Li, Z. & Li, J. How do landscape patterns in urban parks affect multiple cultural ecosystem services perceived by residents?. Sci. Total Environ. 946, 174255 (2024).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Xing, L., Liu, Y., Liu, X., Wei, X. & Mao, Y. Spatio-temporal disparity between demand and supply of park green space service in urban area of Wuhan from 2000 to 2014. Habitat Int. 71, 49–59 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K., Walz, A., Jones, I. & Metzger, M. J. The Socio-cultural Value of Upland Regions in the Vicinity of Cities in Comparison With Urban Green Spaces. Mt. Res. Dev. 36, 465–474 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M. et al. Study on the protection and sustainable development of scenic resources-a case study of Qingxiushan scenic spot in Nanning city. J. Nat. Conserv. 72, 126348 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Y., Mou, N., Zhang, L., Makkonen, T. & Yang, T. Chinese tourists in Nordic countries: An analysis of spatio-temporal behavior using geo-located travel blog data. Computers, Environ. Urban Syst. 85, 101561 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuxia, Z. & Bizhe, W. Research on allocation efficiency of ecological tourism resources in Hunan Province. Environ. Dev. Sustain 24, 12813–12832 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettema, D. & Zwartbol, D. The structure of joint leisure trips: analyzing two-person leisure trips of Dutch students. J. Transp. Geogr. 31, 216–225 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, A.-T. & Chang, J. Shopping and Tourist Night Markets in Taiwan. Tour. Manag. 27, 138–145 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirilenko, A. P., Stepchenkova, S. O. & Hernandez, J. M. Comparative clustering of destination attractions for different origin markets with network and spatial analyses of online reviews. Tour. Manag. 72, 400–410 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, L., Cheng, J. & Swanson, S. R. The impact of tourism activity type on emotion and storytelling: The moderating roles of travel companion presence and relative ability. Tour. Manag. 81, 104138 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tieskens, K. F., Van Zanten, B. T., Schulp, C. J. E. & Verburg, P. H. Aesthetic appreciation of the cultural landscape through social media: An analysis of revealed preference in the Dutch river landscape. Landsc. Urban Plan. 177, 128–137 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vespestad, M. K. & Lindberg, F. Understanding nature-based tourist experiences: an ontological analysis. Curr. Issues Tour. 14, 563–580 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, C. J., Dumont, A., Fortier, J. & Miaux, S. Informal natural greenspaces as places for urban leisure: Perspectives, uses and values from Quebec, Canada. Urban Forestry Urban Green. 90, 128135 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyland, F. & Laterra, P. Recreation potential assessment at large spatial scales: A method based in the ecosystem services approach and landscape metrics. Ecol. Indic. 39, 34–43 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Y., Yang, Y. & Jiao, H. Exploring the Impact of Urban Built Environment on Public Emotions Based on Social Media Data: A Case Study of Wuhan. Land 10, 986 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z. et al. A spatial projection pursuit model for identifying comprehensive urban vitality on blocks using multisource geospatial data. Sustain. Cities Soc. 100, 104998 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Getis, A. Spatial Autocorrelation. Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis: Software Tools, Methods and Applications 255–278 (Springer, 2010).

  • Song, Z. & Liu, W. Changes in the attraction area and network structure of recreation flows in urban green, blue and grey spaces under the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Cities 146, 104744 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Y. et al. Mapping urban green equity and analysing its impacted mechanisms: A novel approach. Sustain. Cities Soc. 101, 105071 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. et al. Examining the importance of built and natural environment factors in predicting self-rated health in older adults: An extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) approach. J. Clean. Prod. 413, 137432 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z., Felton, T. & Mostafavi, A. Interpretable machine learning for predicting urban flash flood hotspots using intertwined land and built-environment features. Computers, Environ. Urban Syst. 110, 102096 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z. et al. Revealing the differences of urban parks’ services to human wellbeing based upon social media data. Urban Forestry Urban Green. 63, 127233 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koohsari, M. J. et al. Mismatch between perceived and objectively measured land use mix and street connectivity: associations with neighborhood walking. J. Urban Health 92, 242–252 (2015).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Arslan, E. S. & Kaymaz, I. Visitor perception of recreational ecosystem services and their role in landscape management of Gölcük Nature Park, Turkey. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 27, 202–213 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghermandi, A., Sinclair, M., Fichtman, E. & Gish, M. Novel insights on intensity and typology of direct human-nature interactions in protected areas through passive crowdsourcing. Glob. Environ. Change 65, 102189 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, S. & Han, F. Tourist Behavior Recognition Through Scenic Spot Image Retrieval Based on Image Processing. Traitement du Signal 37, 619–626 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spake, R. et al. Unpacking ecosystem service bundles: Towards predictive mapping of synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services. Glob. Environ. Change 47, 37–50 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Sun, X., Shan, R. & Wang, B. Mapping and assessing supply–demand matching of recreational ecosystem services in Shandong province, China. Ecol. Indic. 160, 111859 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, G. & Zhang, B. Identification of landscape character types for trans-regional integration in the Wuling Mountain multi-ethnic area of southwest China. Landsc. Urban Plan. 162, 25–35 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, T., Hui, E. C.-M., Lang, W. & Tao, L. People, recreational facility and physical activity: New-type urbanization planning for the healthy communities in China. Habitat Int. 58, 12–22 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchi, V., Marasco, A. & Apicerni, V. Sustainability communication of tourism cities: A text mining approach. Cities 143, 104590 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, R. et al. Social and ecological factors on the perception of cultural ecosystem services and disservices: Insights from Shanghai, China. Landsc. Urban Plan. 259, 105373 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schirpke, U., Meisch, C., Marsoner, T. & Tappeiner, U. Revealing spatial and temporal patterns of outdoor recreation in the European Alps and their surroundings. Ecosyst. Serv. 31, 336–350 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Girma, H. A. Factors shaping international tourist flows: Insights from a systematic study. J. Sustain. Tour., Hospitality, Manag. 11, 30–45 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoderer, B. M. et al. Identifying and mapping the tourists perception of cultural ecosystem services: A case study from an Alpine region. Land Use Policy 56, 251–261 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, N., Li, Y. & Liu, J. Broader applicability of the metacoupling framework than Tobler’s first law of geography for global sustainability: A systematic review. Geogr. Sustainability 4, 6–18 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, N. The Narrative Approach To Living Heritage. Protection of Cultural Heritage 126–138 (2021).

  • Nian, S., Li, D., Zhang, J., Lu, S. & Zhang, X. Stimulus-Organism-Response Framework: Is the Perceived Outstanding Universal Value Attractiveness of Tourists Beneficial to World Heritage Site Conservation?. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 20, 1189 (2023).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cord, A. F., Roeßiger, F. & Schwarz, N. Geocaching data as an indicator for recreational ecosystem services in urban areas: Exploring spatial gradients, preferences and motivations. Landsc. Urban Plan. 144, 151–162 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D., Brown, G., Liu, Y. & Mateo-Babiano, I. A comparison of perceived and geographic access to predict urban park use. Cities 42, 85–96 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachi, L., Ribeiro, S. C., Hermes, J. & Saadi, A. Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) in landscapes with a tourist vocation: Mapping and modeling the physical landscape components that bring benefits to people in a mountain tourist destination in southeastern Brazil. Tour. Manag. 77, 104017 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhalis, D., Leung, D. & Lin, M. Metaverse as a disruptive technology revolutionising tourism management and marketing. Tour. Manag. 97, 104724 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Would you really recommend it? Antecedents of word-of-mouth in medical tourism. Tourism Management 83, 104209 (2021).

  • Paracchini, M. L. et al. Mapping cultural ecosystem services: A framework to assess the potential for outdoor recreation across the EU. Ecol. Indic. 45, 371–385 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, F., Müller, F., Haase, D. & Fohrer, N. Rural–urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics. Land Use Policy 29, 521–535 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Canale, R. R., De Simone, E., Di Maio, A. & Parenti, B. UNESCO World Heritage sites and tourism attractiveness: The case of Italian provinces. Land Use Policy 85, 114–120 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih, H.-Y. Network characteristics of drive tourism destinations: An application of network analysis in tourism. Tour. Manag. 27, 1029–1039 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiaobin, M., Biao, S., Guolin, H., Xing, Z. & Li, L. Evaluation and spatial effects of tourism ecological security in the Yangtze River Delta. Ecol. Indic. 131, 108190 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, I. A., Golomidova, E. S. & Terenina, N. K. Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Change in Volume and Spatial Structure of the Tourist Flow in Finland and Estonia in 2020. Regional Res. Russ. 11, 361–366 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollenstein, L. & Purves, R. Exploring place through user-generated content: Using Flickr tags to describe city cores. J. Spat. Inf. Sci. 21, 48 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Peterson, G. D. & Bennett, E. M. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 5242–5247 (2010).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    Exit mobile version