Incorporating ecosystem services into functional zoning and adaptive management of natural protected areas as case study of the Shennongjia region in China

Incorporating ecosystem services into functional zoning and adaptive management of natural protected areas as case study of the Shennongjia region in China

  • Qiu, J., Liu, Y., Chen, C. & Huang, Q. Spatial structure and driving pathways of the coupling between ecosystem services and human well-beings: A case study of Guangzhou. J. Nat. Resour. 38, 760–778 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium ecosystem assessment, M. E. A. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being (Island press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. B., Daily, G. C. & Ehrlich, P. R. Population diversity: Its extent and extinction. Science 278, 689–692 (1997).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R. et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecol. Econ. 25, 3–15 (1998).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Zhou, W., Pickett, S. T. A., Yu, W. & Li, W. A multiscale analysis of urbanization effects on ecosystem services supply in an urban megaregion. Sci. Total Environ. 662, 824–833 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Li, X., Liu, X., Zhang, Y. & Huang, M. Tele-connecting China’s future urban growth to impacts on ecosystem services under the shared socioeconomic pathways. Sci. Total Environ. 652, 765–779 (2019).

    Article 
    ADS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X., Shi, X., Li, Y., Li, Y. & Huang, P. Spatio-temporal pattern and functional zoning of ecosystem services in the karst mountainous areas of southeastern Yunnan. Acta Geographica Sinica 77, 736–756 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Ma, S., Xu, J., Zhu, D. & Zhang, J. Selection of priority protected region based on ecosystem service trade-offs: A case study of the southern hill and mountain belt, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica 41, 1716–1727 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, W. et al. Assessment of the impact of the poplar ecological retreat project on water conservation in the Dongting Lake wetland region using the InVEST model. Sci. Total Environ. 733, 139423 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Dai, E., Ma, L. & Yin, J. Spatiotemporal and influencing factors analysis of water yield in the Hengduan Mountain region. J. Nat. Resour. 35, 371 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. et al. Spatio-temporal variation of water yield and its driving factors in Qinling Mountains barrier region. J. Nat. Resour. 36, 2507 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, C., Wang, X., Zhang, Y. & Li, S. Emergy analysis of ecosystem services supply and flow in Beijing ecological conservation area. Acta Geographica Sinica 72, 974–985 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, L. et al. Prediction and tradeoff analysis of ecosystem service value in the rapidly urbanizing Foshan City of China: A case study. Acta Ecologica Sinica 40, 9023–9036 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, B., Shi, Y., Li, Q. & Xie, G. The key ecological services and their values of wetland ecosystems in Beijing. J. Nat. Resour. 32, 1311–1324 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aryal, K., Maraseni, T. & Apan, A. How much do we know about trade-offs in ecosystem services? A systematic review of empirical research observations. Sci. Total Environ. 806, 151229 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F., Li, H. & Zhang, A. Ecological risk assessment based on terrestrial ecosystem services in China. Acta Geographica Sinica 74, 432–445 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren, Y. et al. Multi-scenario simulation of land use change and its impact on ecosystem services in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region based on the FLUS-InVEST Model. Acta Ecologica Sinica 43, 111040 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., Jiang, W., Wang, W., Lyu, J. & Deng, Y. Study on the wetland leading service function of Jing–Jin–Ji Urban Agglomeration based on the ecosystem service value. J. Nat. Resour. 34, 1654–1665 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S., Chen, R. & Cheng, X. Spatiotemporal changes of water-related ecosystem services and the responses to Land Use Changes of the Longxi River Basin, Chongqing. J. Soil Water Conserv. 37, 1–11 (2023).

    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., Zhang, L., Sun, G. & Liu, J. Spatial and temporal effect and driving factors of ecosystem service trade-off in the Qingjiang River Basin, China. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 34, 1051–1062 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X., Peng, S., Wang, Z., Huang, B. & Liu, J. Spatial heterogeneity and driving factors of ecosystem water yield service in Yunnan Province, China based on Geodetector. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 33, 2813–2821 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, W., Li, S. & Zhu, L. Ecosystem service footprint flow and the influencing factors within provinces, China. Geograph. Res. 38, 337–347 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhen, J., Wang, Y., Tian, Y., He, S. & Wang, J. Study on ecological environment effects of urban spatial expansion: Taking Inner Mongolia Hohhot City as an example. Geograph. Res. 38, 1080–1091 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Y., Li, J., Zhou, Z., Ma, X. & Zhang, C. Multi-scale representation of trade-offs and synergistic relationship among ecosystem services in Qinling-Daba Mountains. Acta Ecologica Sinica 40, 5465–5477 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, D., Wu, F., He, L., Liu, H. & Jiang, Y. Impact of land use change on ecosystem services: Case study of the Zhangjiakou-Chengde area. Acta Ecologica Sinica 39, 7493–7501 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Redin, J., Luque, S., Poggio, L., Smith, R. & Gimona, A. Spatial Bayesian belief networks as a planning decision tool for mapping ecosystem services trade-offs on forested landscapes. Environ. Res. 144, 15–26 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mina, M. et al. Future ecosystem services from European mountain forests under climate change. J. Appl. Ecol. 54, 389–401 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. R. et al. The consequences of four land-use scenarios for forest ecosystems and the services they provide. Ecosphere 7, e01469 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, X. et al. Trade-offs between carbon sequestration, soil retention and water yield in the Guanzhong-Tianshui Economic Region of China. J. Geogr. Sci. 26, 1449–1462 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, B., Zhang, J. & Zhong, J. Spatiotemporal Differentiation of Ecosystem Services in the Shiyang River Basin from 2005 to 2015. Arid Zone Res. 36, 474–785 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, H., Fu, T., Liang, H. & Liu, J. Cold/hot spots identification and tradeoff/synergy analysis of ecosystem services in Taihang Mountain area. Chin. J. Eco-Agric. 30, 1045–1053 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R. G. Description of the Ecoregions of the United States. (1976).

  • Zhu, J. et al. Ecological function evaluation and regionalization in Baiyangdian Wetland. Acta Ecologica Sinica 40, 459–472 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiang, B. et al. Assessment of ecosystem service importance in Cheng-Yu economic zone. Res. Environ. Sci. 24, 722–730 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • LiYuechen, Y. et al. RS/GIS-based integrated evaluation of the ecosystem services of the three gorges reservoir area (Chongqing section). Acta Ecologica Sinica 33, 168–178 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao, Q. et al. An ecological function zoning approach coupling SOFM and SVM: A case study in Ordos. Acta Geographica Sinica 74, 460–474 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, G. et al. Using ecosystem service bundles to detect trade-offs and synergies across urban–rural complexes. Landscape Urban Plan. 136, 110–121 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, J. & Turner, M. G. Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 12149–12154 (2013).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, J., Yang, Y., Deng, Z. & Hu, Y. Spatial and temporal evolution of ecological vulnerability based on vulnerability scoring diagram model in Shennongjia, China. Sci. Rep. 12, 5168 (2022).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, W., Zhang, M., Zhang, Z., Shi, Y. & Cui, H. Valuation of ecosystem service functions of Dajiuhu wetland in Shennongjia moutains. Wetland Sci. Manag. 17, 38–41 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Wang, S., Peng, H. & Li, Z. Evaluation of ecosystem service values of the forests of Shennongjia nature reserve. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 25, 1431–1438 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, B. Study on ecological security evaluation of Shennongjia Forest Region (Hubei University, 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, P. et al. What impacts ecosystem services in tropical coastal tourism cities? A comparative case study of Haikou and Sanya, China. J. Environ. Manag. 342, 118227 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, R. P. et al. Biomass and carbon budgeting of sustainable agroforestry systems as ecosystem service in Indian Himalayas. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 26, 460–470 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X., Ren, W. & Peng, H. Urban land use change simulation and spatial responses of ecosystem service value under multiple scenarios: A case study of Wuhan, China. Ecol. Ind. 144, 109526 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bian, J., Chen, W. & Zeng, J. Ecosystem services, landscape pattern, and landscape ecological risk zoning in China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30, 17709–17722 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y., Wang, X. & Wang, S. Spatio-temporal changes and trade offs of ecosystem service value and their correlation with human activity intensity: A case study of Cili county. Res. Soil Water Conserv. 29, 311–321 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, T., Chen, W., Li, J. & Liang, J. Spatial relationship between human activities and habitat quality in Shennongjia Forest Region from 1995 to 2015. Acta Ecologica Sinica 41, 6134–6145 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ran, F. et al. Spatiotemporal patterns of the trade-off and synergy relationship among ecosystem services in Poyang Lake Region, China. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 30, 995–1004 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Chen, P., Niu, Y., Liang, Y. & Wei, T. Dynamics and attributions of ecosystem water yields in China from 2001 to 2020. Ecol. Ind. 143, 109373 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermosilla-Palma, K., Pliscoff, P. & Folchi, M. Sixty years of land-use and land-cover change dynamics in a global biodiversity hotspot under threat from global change. J. Land Use Sci. 16, 467–478 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, K., Zhang, F., Feng, Q., Wei, Y. & Yang, J. Topographic gradient effect and ecological zoning of ecosystem services in Heihe River Basin. J. Desert Res. 43, 139–149 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. et al. Spatial and temporal variations of ecosystem service synergy and trade-off in Qinling Mountains, China. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 33, 2057–2067 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebabu, K. et al. Land use, management and climate effects on runoff and soil loss responses in the highlands of Ethiopia. J. Environ. Manag. 326, 116707 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Román-Cascón, C. et al. Can we use satellite-based soil-moisture products at high resolution to investigate land-use differences and land-atmosphere interactions? A case study in the savanna. Remote Sens. 12, 1701 (2020).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y., Li, X. & Liu, Y. Cultivated land protection and rational use in China. Land Use Policy 106, 105454 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Y., Wang, K. & Huang, L. Trade-offs and synergies of ecosystem services in rural areas: A case study of Huzhou. Acta Ecologica Sinica 42, 6875–6887 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *