Biodiversity-rich recreational areas near cities as a nature-based mental health solution

Biodiversity-rich recreational areas near cities as a nature-based mental health solution

  • GBD 2019 Mental Disorders Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Psychiatry 9, 137–150 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Comprehensive Mental Health Action Plan 2013–2030 (World Health Organization, 2021).

  • Aerts, R., Honnay, O. & Van Nieuwenhuyse, A. Biodiversity and human health: mechanisms and evidence of the positive health effects of diversity in nature and green spaces. Br. Med. Bull. 127, 5–22 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, R. W. F. et al. Where the wild things are! Do urban green spaces with greater avian biodiversity promote more positive emotions in humans? Urban Ecosyst. 23, 301–317 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrus, G. et al. Go greener, feel better? The positive effects of biodiversity on the well-being of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas. Landscape Urban Plann. 134, 221–228 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. T. C. et al. Doses of neighborhood nature: the benefits for mental health of living with nature. BioScience 67, 147–155 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, R. A., Irvine, K. N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P. H. & Gaston, K. J. Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biol. Lett. 3, 390–394 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Grandbastien, A., Burel, F., Hellier, E. & Bergerot, B. A step towards understanding the relationship between species diversity and psychological restoration of visitors in urban green spaces using landscape heterogeneity. Landscape Urban Plann. 195, 103728 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, R. et al. Economic value of protected areas via visitor mental health. Nat. Commun. 10, 5005 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratman, G. N. et al. Nature and mental health: an ecosystem service perspective. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax0903 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Marselle, M. R. et al. Pathways linking biodiversity to human health: a conceptual framework. Environ. Int. 150, 106420 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, D. Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in urban green space accessibility: where to intervene? Landscape Urban Plann. 102, 234–244 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekkel, E. D. & de Vries, S. Nearby green space and human health: evaluating accessibility metrics. Landscape Urban Plann. 157, 214–220 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Y., Sun, F. & Che, Y. Public green spaces and human wellbeing: mapping the spatial inequity and mismatching status of public green space in the Central City of Shanghai. Urban For. Urban Green. 27, 59–68 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, G. R. in A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation (eds Champ, P. A. et al.) 187–233 (Springer Netherlands, 2017).

  • van Berkel, D. B. & Verburg, P. H. Spatial quantification and valuation of cultural ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape. Ecol. Indic. 37, 163–174 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Razzouk, D. (ed.). Mental Health Economics (Springer International Publishing, 2017).

  • Maxwell, S. L. et al. Area-based conservation in the twenty-first century. Nature 586, 217–227 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. E. M., Dudley, N., Segan, D. B. & Hockings, M. The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature 515, 67–73 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. E. M. et al. The exceptional value of intact forest ecosystems. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 599–610 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Iino, H., Hashiguchi, M. & Hori, S. Estimating the range of incremental cost-effectiveness thresholds for healthcare based on willingness to pay and GDP per capita: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 17, e0266934 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertram, M. Y. et al. Cost–effectiveness thresholds: pros and cons. Bull. World Health Organ. 94, 925–930 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (GBD 2019) (IHME, 2020).

  • The Lancet Global Health. Mental health matters. Lancet Glob. Health 8, e1352 (2020).

  • Waldron, A. et al. Protecting 30% of the Planet for Nature: Costs, Benefits, and Economic Implications (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 2020).

  • Bryant, R. A. Improving the mental health of low- and middle-income countries. Nat. Hum. Behav. 3, 653–655 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, B. et al. Contrasting inequality in human exposure to greenspace between cities of global north and global south. Nat. Commun. 13, 4636 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmford, A. et al. Walk on the wild side: estimating the global magnitude of visits to protected areas. PLoS Biol. 13, e1002074 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. R. Restoration, reconciliation, and reconnecting with nature nearby. Biol. Conserv. 127, 356–361 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Perino, A. et al. Rewilding complex ecosystems. Science 364, eaav5570 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, Y.-F., Spenceley, A., Hvenegaard, G. and Buckley, R. Tourism and Visitor Management in Protected Areas: Guidelines for Sustainability (IUCN, 2018).

  • Martinez-Harms, M. J. et al. Inequality in access to cultural ecosystem services from protected areas in the Chilean biodiversity hotspot. Sci. Total Environ. 636, 1128–1138 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugiyama, T., Francis, J., Middleton, N. J., Owen, N. & Giles-Corti, B. Associations between recreational walking and attractiveness, size, and proximity of neighborhood open spaces. Am. J. Public Health 100, 1752–1757 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, A. et al. Comprehensive Total Cost of Ownership Quantification for Vehicles with Different Size Classes and Powertrains (Argonne National Laboratory, 2021).

  • Chen, T. D., Kockelman, K. M. & Hanna, J. P. Operations of a shared, autonomous, electric vehicle fleet: implications of vehicle and charging infrastructure decisions. Transp. Res. Part Policy Pract. 94, 243–254 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, F., Wang, X. H., Nunes, P. A. L. D. & Ma, C. The recreational value of Gold Coast beaches, Australia: an application of the travel cost method. Ecosyst. Serv. 11, 106–114 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiavina, M., Melchiorri, M. & Pesaresi, M. GHS-SMOD R2022A – GHS Settlement Layers, Application of the Degree of Urbanisation Methodology (Stage I) to GHS-POP R2022A and GHS-BUILT-S R2022A, Multitemporal (1975–2030) (European Commission & Joint Research Centre (JRC), 2022).

  • Dijkstra, L. & Poelman, H. A Harmonised Definition of Cities and Rural Areas: The New Degree of Urbanisation Working Paper WP 01/2014 (European Commission, 2014).

  • Weiss, D. J. et al. A global map of travel time to cities to assess inequalities in accessibility in 2015. Nature 553, 333–336 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP-WCMC and IUCN Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN, 2023); https://www.protectedplanet.net/en/thematic-areas/wdpa?tab=WDPA

  • UNEP-WCMC and IUCN Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN, 2018); https://www.protectedplanet.net/en/thematic-areas/wdpa?tab=WDPA

  • UNEP-WCMC and IUCN Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN, 2016); https://www.protectedplanet.net/en/thematic-areas/wdpa?tab=WDPA

  • Dudley, N. et al. IUCN WCPA Best Practice Guidance on Recognising Protected Areas and Assigning Management Categories and Governance Types (IUCN, 2013).

  • BirdLife International The World Database of Key Biodiversity Areas (KBA Partnership, 2023); www.keybiodiversityareas.org

  • Potapov, P. et al. The last frontiers of wilderness: tracking loss of intact forest landscapes from 2000 to 2013. Sci. Adv. 3, e1600821 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Global 1 km Population (WorldPop, CIESIN & Columbia University, 2018); https://doi.org/10.5258/SOTON/WP00647

  • World Bank World Development Indicators 2021 (World Bank, 2021); https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/search/dataset/0037712/World-Development-Indicators.

  • Runfola, D. et al. geoBoundaries: a global database of political administrative boundaries. PLoS ONE 15, e0231866 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Heagney, E. C., Rose, J. M., Ardeshiri, A. & Kovac, M. The economic value of tourism and recreation across a large protected area network. Land Use Policy 88, 104084 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Compostella, J., Fulton, L. M., De Kleine, R., Kim, H. C. & Wallington, T. J. Near- (2020) and long-term (2030–2035) costs of automated, electrified, and shared mobility in the United States. Transp. Policy 85, 54–66 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Breetz, H. L. & Salon, D. Do electric vehicles need subsidies? Ownership costs for conventional, hybrid, and electric vehicles in 14 U.S. cities. Energy Policy 120, 238–249 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, L. J., Ermgassen, Szu, Balmford, A., White, M. & Weinstein, N. Is variety the spice of life? An experimental investigation into the effects of species richness on self-reported mental well-being. PLoS ONE 12, e0170225 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha, J. & Kim, H. J. The restorative effects of campus landscape biodiversity: assessing visual and auditory perceptions among university students. Urban For. Urban Greening 64, 127259 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Marselle, M. R. et al. Urban street tree biodiversity and antidepressant prescriptions. Sci. Rep. 10, 22445 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozario, K. et al. The more the merrier? Perceived forest biodiversity promotes short-term mental health and well-being—a multicentre study. People Nat. 6, 180–201 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Marselle, M. R., Martens, D., Dallimer, M. & Irvine, K. N. in Biodiversity and Health in the Face of Climate Change (eds Marselle, M. R. et al.) 175–211 (Springer International Publishing, 2019).

  • Delignette-Muller, M. L. & Dutang, C. fitdistrplus: an R package for fitting distributions. J. Stat. Software (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. P. et al. Spending at least 120 minutes a week in nature is associated with good health and wellbeing. Sci. Rep. 9, 7730 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaung, W. & Carrasco, L. R. Travel cost analysis of an urban protected area and parks in Singapore: a mobile phone data application. J. Environ. Manage. 261, 110238 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Meena, D., Deka, K. & Kumar, A. Application of travel cost method to estimate tourism recreational value of Assam State Zoo cum Botanical Garden, Guwahati, Assam, India. Int. J. Econ. Account. 10, 340–351 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, S. & Larkin, S. Valuing ecological restoration and recreational benefits in a mountain protected area: the case of Los Nevados National Park, Colombia. J. Sustain. Dev. 3, 3–16 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia, C. Differences in travel time from all pixel locations within selected major cities to biodiversity-rich recreational areas. figshare (2025).

  • Xia, C. Shared code for simulating extra mental health benefits of high biodiversity on anxiety and depression reduction. figshare (2025).

  • link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *