International Health Conference. Constitution of the world health organization. Bull. World Health Org. 80(12), 983–984 (2002).
Google Scholar
Montgomery, M. United Nations Population Fund: State of world population 2007: Unleashing the potential of urban growth. Popul. Dev. Rev. 33(3), 639–641 (2007).
Google Scholar
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2018). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision, Online Edition.
McDonald, R. I. et al. Research gaps in knowledge of the impact of urban growth on biodiversity. Nat. Sustain. 3(1), 16–24 (2020).
Google Scholar
McDonald, R. I., Marcotullio, P. J. & Güneralp, B. Urbanization and global trends in biodiversity and ecosystem services. In Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities: a global assessment (eds Elmqvist, T. et al.) 31–52 (Springer, 2013).
Google Scholar
Houlden, V., Jani, A. & Hong, A. Is biodiversity of greenspace important for human health and wellbeing? A bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review. Urban For. Urban Green. 66, 127385 (2021).
Google Scholar
Aerts, R., Honnay, O. & Van Nieuwenhuyse, A. Biodiversity and human health: Mechanisms and evidence of the positive health effects of diversity in nature and green spaces. Br. Med. Bull. 127(1), 5–22 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lovell, R., Wheeler, B. W., Higgins, S. L., Irvine, K. N. & Depledge, M. H. A systematic review of the health and well-being benefits of biodiverse environments. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part B 17(1), 1–20 (2014).
Google Scholar
Linton, M. J., Dieppe, P. & Medina-Lara, A. Review of 99 self-report measures for assessing well-being in adults: Exploring dimensions of well-being and developments over time. BMJ Open 6(7), e010641 (2016).
Google Scholar
Korpela, K., Pasanen, T. & Ratcliffe, E. Biodiversity and psychological well-being. Urban biodiversity 134–149 (Routledge, 2018).
Google Scholar
Marselle, M. R., Martens, D., Dallimer, M. & Irvine, K. N. Review of the mental health and well-being benefits of biodiversity. In Biodiversity and Health in the Face of Climate Change (eds Marselle, M. R. et al.) 175–211 (Springer, 2019).
Google Scholar
White, M. P., Alcock, I., Wheeler, B. W. & Depledge, M. H. Would you be happier living in a greener urban area? A fixed-effects analysis of panel data. Psychol. Sci. 24(6), 920–928 (2013).
Google Scholar
Beyer, K. M. et al. Exposure to neighborhood green space and mental health: Evidence from the survey of the health of Wisconsin. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 11(3), 3453–3472 (2014).
Google Scholar
Wei, H. et al. The association between plant diversity and perceived emotions for visitors in urban forests: A pilot study across 49 parks in China. Urban For. Urban Green. 73, 127613 (2022).
Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. & Kaplan, S. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective (Cambridge University Press, 1989).
Google Scholar
Kaplan, S. The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. J. Environ. Psychol. 15(3), 169–182 (1995).
Google Scholar
Ulrich, R. S. Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In Behavior and the Natural Environment 85–125 (Springer, 1983).
Google Scholar
Ulrich, R. S. et al. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J. Environ. Psychol. 11(3), 201–230 (1991).
Google Scholar
Marselle, M. R., Lindley, S. J., Cook, P. A. & Bonn, A. Biodiversity and health in the urban environment. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 8(2), 146–156 (2021).
Google Scholar
Collins, R. M. et al. A systematic map of research exploring the effect of greenspace on mental health. Landsc. Urban Plan. 201, 103823 (2020).
Google Scholar
Sandifer, P. A., Sutton-Grier, A. E. & Ward, B. P. Exploring connections among nature, biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human health and well-being: Opportunities to enhance health and biodiversity conservation. Ecosyst. Serv. 12, 1–15 (2015).
Google Scholar
Cox, D. T. et al. Doses of neighbourhood nature: The benefits for mental health of living with nature. BioScience 67(2), 147–155 (2017).
Lindemann-Matthies, P., Junge, X. & Matthies, D. The influence of plant diversity on people’s perception and aesthetic appreciation of grassland vegetation. Biol. Conserv. 143(1), 195–202 (2010).
Google Scholar
Qiu, L., Lindberg, S. & Nielsen, A. B. Is biodiversity attractive?—On-site perception of recreational and biodiversity values in urban green space. Landsc. Urban Plan. 119, 136–146 (2013).
Google Scholar
Lindemann-Matthies, P. & Matthies, D. The influence of plant species richness on stress recovery of humans. Web Ecol. 18(2), 121–128 (2018).
Google Scholar
Methorst, J., Bonn, A., Marselle, M., Böhning-Gaese, K. & Rehdanz, K. Species richness is positively related to mental health—A study for Germany. Landsc. Urban Plan. 211, 104084. (2021).
Google Scholar
Cameron, R. W. F. et al. Where the wild things are! Do urban green spaces with greater avian biodiversity promote more positive emotions in humans?. Urban Ecosyst. 23(2), 301–317. (2020).
Google Scholar
Butler, S. J., Boccaccio, L., Gregory, R. D., Vorisek, P. & Norris, K. Quantifying the impact of land-use change to European farmland bird populations. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 137(3–4), 348–357 (2010).
Google Scholar
Dallimer, M. et al. Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: Understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness. BioScience 62(1), 47–55 (2012).
Google Scholar
Wheeler, B. W. et al. Beyond greenspace: an ecological study of population general health and indicators of natural environment type and quality. Int. J. Health Geogr. 14, 1–17 (2015).
Google Scholar
Woods, B. Animals on display: Principles for interpreting captive wildlife. J. Tour. Stud. 9(1), 28–39 (1998).
Google Scholar
Vanhöfen, J., Schöffski, N., Härtel, T. & Randler, C. Are lay people able to estimate breeding bird diversity?. Animals 12(22), 3095 (2022).
Google Scholar
Hooykaas, M. J. et al. Identification skills in biodiversity professionals and laypeople: A gap in species literacy. Biol. Conserv. 238, 108202 (2019).
Google Scholar
Parra-Saldívar, A., Abades, S., Celis-Diez, J. L. & Gelcich, S. Exploring perceived well-being from urban parks: Insights from a megacity in Latin America. Sustainability 12(18), 7586 (2020).
Google Scholar
Shwartz, A., Tzunz, M., Gafter, L. & Colléony, A. One size does not fit all: The complex relationship between biodiversity and psychological well-being. Urban For. Urban Green. 86, 128008. (2023).
Google Scholar
Boley, B. B. et al. Measuring place attachment with the abbreviated place attachment scale (APAS). J. Environ. Psychol. 74, 101577 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bryce, R. et al. Subjective well-being indicators for large-scale assessment of cultural ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 21, 258–269. (2016).
Google Scholar
Droseltis, O. & Vignoles, V. L. Towards an integrative model of place identification: Dimensionality and predictors of intrapersonal-level place preferences. J. Environ. Psychol. 30(1), 23–34 (2010).
Google Scholar
Lewicka, M. Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years?. J. Environ. Psychol. 31(3), 207–230 (2011).
Google Scholar
Randler, C., Friedrich, S. & Koch, S. Psychological restoration, place attachment and satisfaction in birders and non-birding visitors. J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour. 44, 100679 (2023).
Google Scholar
Scannell, L. & Gifford, R. Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. J. Environ. Psychol. 30(1), 1–10 (2010).
Google Scholar
Subiza-Pérez, M., Vozmediano, L. & San Juan, C. Welcome to your plaza: Assessing the restorative potential of urban squares through survey and objective evaluation methods. Cities 100, 102461 (2020).
Google Scholar
Menatti, L., Subiza-Pérez, M., Villalpando-Flores, A., Vozmediano, L. & San Juan, C. Place attachment and identification as predictors of expected landscape restorativeness. J. Environ. Psychol. 63, 36–43 (2019).
Google Scholar
Young, C., Hofmann, M., Frey, D., Moretti, M. & Bauer, N. Psychological restoration in urban gardens related to garden type, biodiversity and garden-related stress. Landsc. Urban Plan. 198, 103777. (2020).
Google Scholar
Hepburn, L., Smith, A. C., Zelenski, J. & Fahrig, L. Bird diversity unconsciously increases people’s satisfaction with where they live. Land 10(2), 153 (2021).
Google Scholar
Nghiem, T. et al. Biodiverse urban forests, happy people: Experimental evidence linking perceived biodiversity, restoration, and emotional wellbeing. Urban For. Urban Green. 59, 127030 (2021).
Google Scholar
Carrus, G. et al. Go greener, feel better? The positive effects of biodiversity on the well-being of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas. Landsc. Urban Plan. 134, 221–228 (2015).
Google Scholar
Chang, J., Wu, C.-C. & Chang, C.-Y. Landscape naturalness and restoring benefit: A connection through bird diversity. Urban Ecosyst. 27(1), 41–50. (2024).
Google Scholar
Schebella, M. F., Weber, D., Schultz, L. & Weinstein, P. The wellbeing benefits associated with perceived and measured biodiversity in Australian urban green spaces. Sustainability 11(3), 802 (2019).
Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Regional Office for, E. (2016). Urban green spaces and health. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/345751.
White, M. P., Elliott, L. R., Gascon, M., Roberts, B. & Fleming, L. E. Blue space, health and well-being: A narrative overview and synthesis of potential benefits. Environ. Res. 191, 110169. (2020).
Google Scholar
Wyles, K. J. et al. Are Some natural environments more psychologically beneficial than others? The importance of type and quality on connectedness to nature and psychological restoration. Environ. Behav. 51(2), 111–143. (2019).
Google Scholar
Barton, J. & Pretty, J. What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving mental health? A multi-study analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44(10), 3947–3955 (2010).
Google Scholar
Grahn, P. & Stigsdotter, U. A. Landscape planning and stress. Urban For. Urban Green. 2(1), 1–18 (2003).
Google Scholar
Hartig, T., Evans, G. W., Jamner, L. D., Davis, D. S. & Gärling, T. Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. J. Environ. Psychol. 23(2), 109–123 (2003).
Google Scholar
Maas, J. et al. Morbidity is related to a green living environment. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 63(12), 967–973 (2009).
Google Scholar
Maas, J., Verheij, R. A., Groenewegen, P. P., De Vries, S. & Spreeuwenberg, P. Green space, urbanity, and health: How strong is the relation?. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 60(7), 587–592 (2006).
Google Scholar
Ottosson, J. & Grahn, P. A comparison of leisure time spent in a garden with leisure time spent indoors: On measures of restoration in residents in geriatric care. Landsc. Res. 30(1), 23–55 (2005).
Google Scholar
Roe, J. & Aspinall, P. The restorative benefits of walking in urban and rural settings in adults with good and poor mental health. Health Place 17(1), 103–113 (2011).
Google Scholar
Subiza-Pérez, M. et al. Exploring psychological restoration in favorite indoor and outdoor urban places using a top-down perspective. J. Environ. Psychol. 78, 101706 (2021).
Google Scholar
Venter, O. et al. Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation. Nat. Commun. (2016).
Google Scholar
Stein, A., Gerstner, K. & Kreft, H. Environmental heterogeneity as a universal driver of species richness across taxa, biomes and spatial scales. Ecol. Lett. 17(7), 866–880 (2014).
Google Scholar
Fuller, R. A., Irvine, K. N., Davies, Z. G., Armsworth, P. R., & Gaston, K. J. Interactions between people and birds in urban landscapes. (2013).
Shwartz, A., Turbé, A., Simon, L. & Julliard, R. Enhancing urban biodiversity and its influence on city-dwellers: An experiment. Biol. Conserv. 171, 82–90 (2014).
Google Scholar
Schebella, M., Weber, D., Schultz, L. & Weinstein, P. In pursuit of urban sustainability: Predicting public perceptions of park biodiversity using simple assessment tools. Int. J. Environ. Res. 13(4), 707–720 (2019).
Google Scholar
Gidlow, C. et al. Development of the natural environment scoring tool (NEST). Urban For. Urban Green. 29, 322–333 (2018).
Google Scholar
Voigt, A., Kabisch, N., Wurster, D., Haase, D. & Breuste, J. Structural diversity: A multi-dimensional approach to assess recreational services in urban parks. Ambio 43(4), 480–491 (2014).
Google Scholar
Meng, L., Li, S. & Zhang, X. Exploring biodiversity’s impact on mental well-being through the social-ecological lens: Emphasizing the role of biodiversity characteristics and nature relatedness. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 105, 107454. (2024).
Google Scholar
Lee, J. H. & Scott, D. Measuring birding specialization: A confirmatory factor analysis. Leisure Sci. 26(3), 245–260 (2004).
Google Scholar
Randler, C. & Heil, F. Determinants of bird species literacy—Activity/interest and specialization are more important than socio-demographic variables. Animals 11(6), 1595 (2021).
Google Scholar
Randler, C. An analysis of heterogeneity in German speaking birdwatchers reveals three distinct clusters and gender differences. Birds 2(3), 250–260 (2021).
Google Scholar
Belaire, J. A., Westphal, L. M., Whelan, C. J. & Minor, E. S. Urban residents’ perceptions of birds in the neighborhood: Biodiversity, cultural ecosystem services, and disservices. Condor Ornithol. Appl. 117(2), 192–202 (2015).
Ferraro, D. M. et al. The phantom chorus: Birdsong boosts human well-being in protected areas. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 287(1941), 20201811. (2020).
Google Scholar
Southon, G. E., Jorgensen, A., Dunnett, N., Hoyle, H. & Evans, K. L. Perceived species-richness in urban green spaces: Cues, accuracy and well-being impacts. Landsc. Urban Plan. 172, 1–10. (2018).
Google Scholar
Bibby, C. J., Burgess, N. D., Ecologists, E. A., Hillis, D. M., Hill, D. A., Ornithology, B. T. F., Mustoe, S., Birds, R. S. F. T. P. O., Lambton, S., & International, B. Bird Census Techniques. (Elsevier Science, 2000). https://books.google.de/books?id=Ld5wkzPp49cC
Höll, N., Gerstner, H., Raddatz, J., Murmann-Kristen, L., Mast, R., Breunig, T., & Demuth, S. Arten, Biotope, Landschaft. Schlüssel zum Erfassen, Beschreiben, Bewerten. fourth ed. LUBW, Karlsruhe, (2009).
Reichert, G. Interrelationships between humans and birds: How urbanization affects the ecape behaviour of birds and possible consequences in the Feel-Good Factor of nature space visitors. Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen. (2022). [Unpublished Bachelor Thesis]
Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie. (2023). Produkte und Dienste. Assessed 30 Aug, 2024;
Grellier, J. et al. BlueHealth: A study programme protocol for mapping and quantifying the potential benefits to public health and well-being from Europe’s blue spaces. BMJ Open 7(6), e016188 (2017).
Google Scholar
Venter, O., Sanderson, E. W., Magrach, A., Allan, J. R., Beher, J., Jones, K. R., Possingham, H. P., Laurance, W. F., Wood, P., Fekete, B. M., Levy, M. A., & Watson, J. E. Last of the Wild Project, Version 3 (LWP-3): 2009 Human Footprint, 2018 Release NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). (2018).
White, M. P. et al. Marine wildlife as an important component of coastal visits: The role of perceived biodiversity and species behaviour. Marine Policy 78, 80–89 (2017).
Google Scholar
Fuller, R. A., Irvine, K. N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P. H. & Gaston, K. J. Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biol. Lett. 3(4), 390–394 (2007).
Google Scholar
Feng, X. et al. Green space quality and adolescent mental health: Do personality traits matter?. Environ. Res. 206, 112591 (2022).
Google Scholar
Mayer, F. S. & Frantz, C. M. The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. J. Environ. Psychol. 24(4), 503–515. (2004).
Google Scholar
Cheng, J. C. H. & Monroe, M. C. Connection to nature: Children’s affective attitude toward nature. Environ. Behav. 44(1), 31–49 (2012).
Google Scholar
Taylor, L., Hahs, A. K. & Hochuli, D. F. Wellbeing and urban living: Nurtured by nature. Urban Ecosyst. 21, 197–208 (2018).
Google Scholar
Cox, D. T. & Gaston, K. J. Likeability of garden birds: Importance of species knowledge & richness in connecting people to nature. PloS one 10(11), e0141505 (2015).
Google Scholar
Methorst, J. et al. The importance of species diversity for human well-being in Europe. Ecol. Econ. 181, 106917. (2021).
Google Scholar
Ward Thompson, C. Landscape and Health Special Issue Vol. 41, 591–597 (Taylor & Francis, 2016).
Google Scholar
Li, J. et al. Comparative study of the physiological and psychological effects of forest and urban auditory stimulus on humans. Int. J. Geoherit. Parks 9(3), 363–373. (2021).
Google Scholar
Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., De Vries, S. & Frumkin, H. Nature and health. Ann. Rev. Public Health 35, 207–228 (2014).
Google Scholar
Martens, D., Gutscher, H. & Bauer, N. Walking in “wild” and “tended” urban forests: The impact on psychological well-being. J. Environ. Psychol. 31(1), 36–44 (2011).
Google Scholar
Hussain, R. I. et al. Management of mountainous meadows associated with biodiversity attributes, perceived health benefits and cultural ecosystem services. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 1497 (2019).
Google Scholar
Gonçalves, P. et al. What’s biodiversity got to do with it? Perceptions of biodiversity and restorativeness in urban parks. Ecol. Soc. (2021).
Google Scholar
McEwan, K., Ferguson, F. J., Richardson, M. & Cameron, R. The good things in urban nature: A thematic framework for optimising urban planning for nature connectedness. Landsc. Urban Plan. 194, 103687 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. Biophilia (Harvard University Press, 1986).
Wilson, E. O. Biophilia and the conservation ethic. In Wilson Evolutionary Perspectives on Environmental Problems (eds Dustin, J. P. & Iver Mysterud, E. O.) 250–258 (Routledge, 2017).
Google Scholar
Luo, S., Shi, J., Lu, T. & Furuya, K. Sit down and rest: Use of virtual reality to evaluate preferences and mental restoration in urban park pavilions. Landsc. Urban Plan. 220, 104336 (2022).
Google Scholar
link