Assessing recreation services for heritage resources in scenic areas based on behavioral semantic perspective

Assessing recreation services for heritage resources in scenic areas based on behavioral semantic perspective

  • Sun, X., Liu, H., Liao, C., Nong, H. & Yang, P. Understanding recreational ecosystem service supply-demand mismatch and social groups’ preferences: Implications for urban–rural planning. Landsc. Urban Plan. 241, 104903 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghasemi, M., Charrahy, Z. & González-García, A. Mapping cultural ecosystem services provision: An integrated model of recreation and ecotourism opportunities. Land Use Policy 131, 106732 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yousaf, A., Amin, I. & Santos, J. A. C. Tourists’ Motivations to Travel: a Theoretical Perspective on the Existing Literature. Tour. hosp. manag. 24, 197–211 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nian, S., Bao, J., Chen, Y., Zhang, X. & Chen, Y. How does the tourist experience affect the conservation of World Heritage Sites via the stimulus‒organism‒response model? Mount Sanqingshan National Park, China. npj Herit. Sci. 13, 21 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunkel, A. Visualizing the perceived environment using crowdsourced photo geodata. Landsc. Urban Plan. 142, 173–186 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beijing Jinghe Cultural Tourism Development Institute. China’s Ministry of Culture and Tourism’s research report. (Ministry of Culture and Tourism of the People’s Republic of China, 2019).

  • Standard for scenic and historic areas classification. (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China, 2008).

  • Liu, J. et al. Facilitating urban tourism governance with crowdsourced big data: A framework based on Shenzhen and Jiangmen, China. Int. J. Appl. Earth Observation Geoinf. 124, 103509 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, R., Ann Diehl, J., Zhang, R. & Wang, H. Spatial equity of urban parks from the perspective of recreational opportunities and recreational environment quality: A case study in Singapore. Landsc. Urban Plan. 247, 105065 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, L. et al. Exploring the evolution of coupled natural-cultural ecosystem services and their geographically scaled driven modeling in a coastal city of Southeast China. J. Environ. Manag. 361, 121265 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, J. & Turner, M. G. Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 12149–12154 (2013).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, A. B., Olsen, S. B. & Lundhede, T. An economic valuation of the recreational benefits associated with nature-based forest management practices. Landsc. Urban Plan. 80, 63–71 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, C. M. & Cook, A. The recreational value of Lake McKenzie, Fraser Island: An application of the travel cost method. Tour. Manag. 29, 1197–1205 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, S. S. K. et al. Mapping recreation as an ecosystem service: Considering scale, interregional differences and the influence of physical attributes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 175, 149–160 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, R.-Z. et al. Spatio-temporal characteristics of cultural ecosystem services and their relations to landscape factors in Hangzhou Xixi National Wetland Park, China. Ecol. Indic. 154, 110910 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, W., Zhang, Z., Zhang, H. & Tovuudorj, R. Integrating spatial patterns and driving factors of cultural ecosystem services into territorial spatial governance: A case study of the Horqin Sandy Land with multi-ethnic settlements. Habitat Int. 148, 103093 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, A. et al. Social media reveal that charismatic species are not the main attractor of ecotourists to sub-Saharan protected areas. Sci. Rep. 7, 763 (2017).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. Rethinking the sociology of tourism. Ann. Tour. Res. 6, 18–35 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y., Shao, Y. & Chan, E. H. W. Co-visitation network in tourism-driven peri-urban area based on social media analytics: A case study in Shenzhen, China. Landsc. Urban Plan. 204, 103934 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Teles da Mota, V. & Pickering, C. Using social media to assess nature-based tourism: Current research and future trends. J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour. 30, 100295 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, T. et al. Unveiling interprovincial geographic patterns of 5A-level tourism cultural ecosystem service flows and tourist preferences in China’s metacoupled systems. Appl. Geogr. 172, 103432 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. & Bicocchi, N. Crowd-Sourcing Information Dissemination Based on Spatial Behavior and Social Networks. Mob. Inf. Syst. 2021, 6652740 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaragozí, B., Trilles, S. & Gutiérrez, A. Passive Mobile Data for Studying Seasonal Tourism Mobilities: An Application in a Mediterranean Coastal Destination. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 10, 98 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijles, E. W., de Bakker, M., Groote, P. D. & Barske, R. Analysing hiker movement patterns using GPS data: Implications for park management. Computers, Environ. Urban Syst. 47, 44–57 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Havinga, I., Marcos, D., Bogaart, P. W., Hein, L. & Tuia, D. Social media and deep learning capture the aesthetic quality of the landscape. Sci. Rep. 11, 20000 (2021).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., Seo, B., Koellner, T. & Lautenbach, S. Mapping cultural ecosystem services 2.0 – Potential and shortcomings from unlabeled crowd sourced images. Ecol. Indic. 96, 505–515 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • van Weerdenburg, D., Scheider, S., Adams, B., Spierings, B. & van der Zee, E. Where to go and what to do: Extracting leisure activity potentials from Web data on urban space. Computers, Environ. Urban Syst. 73, 143–156 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bi, X., Gan, X., Jiang, Z., Li, Z. & Li, J. How do landscape patterns in urban parks affect multiple cultural ecosystem services perceived by residents?. Sci. Total Environ. 946, 174255 (2024).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Xing, L., Liu, Y., Liu, X., Wei, X. & Mao, Y. Spatio-temporal disparity between demand and supply of park green space service in urban area of Wuhan from 2000 to 2014. Habitat Int. 71, 49–59 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K., Walz, A., Jones, I. & Metzger, M. J. The Socio-cultural Value of Upland Regions in the Vicinity of Cities in Comparison With Urban Green Spaces. Mt. Res. Dev. 36, 465–474 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M. et al. Study on the protection and sustainable development of scenic resources-a case study of Qingxiushan scenic spot in Nanning city. J. Nat. Conserv. 72, 126348 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Y., Mou, N., Zhang, L., Makkonen, T. & Yang, T. Chinese tourists in Nordic countries: An analysis of spatio-temporal behavior using geo-located travel blog data. Computers, Environ. Urban Syst. 85, 101561 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuxia, Z. & Bizhe, W. Research on allocation efficiency of ecological tourism resources in Hunan Province. Environ. Dev. Sustain 24, 12813–12832 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettema, D. & Zwartbol, D. The structure of joint leisure trips: analyzing two-person leisure trips of Dutch students. J. Transp. Geogr. 31, 216–225 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, A.-T. & Chang, J. Shopping and Tourist Night Markets in Taiwan. Tour. Manag. 27, 138–145 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirilenko, A. P., Stepchenkova, S. O. & Hernandez, J. M. Comparative clustering of destination attractions for different origin markets with network and spatial analyses of online reviews. Tour. Manag. 72, 400–410 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, L., Cheng, J. & Swanson, S. R. The impact of tourism activity type on emotion and storytelling: The moderating roles of travel companion presence and relative ability. Tour. Manag. 81, 104138 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tieskens, K. F., Van Zanten, B. T., Schulp, C. J. E. & Verburg, P. H. Aesthetic appreciation of the cultural landscape through social media: An analysis of revealed preference in the Dutch river landscape. Landsc. Urban Plan. 177, 128–137 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vespestad, M. K. & Lindberg, F. Understanding nature-based tourist experiences: an ontological analysis. Curr. Issues Tour. 14, 563–580 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, C. J., Dumont, A., Fortier, J. & Miaux, S. Informal natural greenspaces as places for urban leisure: Perspectives, uses and values from Quebec, Canada. Urban Forestry Urban Green. 90, 128135 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyland, F. & Laterra, P. Recreation potential assessment at large spatial scales: A method based in the ecosystem services approach and landscape metrics. Ecol. Indic. 39, 34–43 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Y., Yang, Y. & Jiao, H. Exploring the Impact of Urban Built Environment on Public Emotions Based on Social Media Data: A Case Study of Wuhan. Land 10, 986 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z. et al. A spatial projection pursuit model for identifying comprehensive urban vitality on blocks using multisource geospatial data. Sustain. Cities Soc. 100, 104998 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Getis, A. Spatial Autocorrelation. Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis: Software Tools, Methods and Applications 255–278 (Springer, 2010).

  • Song, Z. & Liu, W. Changes in the attraction area and network structure of recreation flows in urban green, blue and grey spaces under the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Cities 146, 104744 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Y. et al. Mapping urban green equity and analysing its impacted mechanisms: A novel approach. Sustain. Cities Soc. 101, 105071 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. et al. Examining the importance of built and natural environment factors in predicting self-rated health in older adults: An extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) approach. J. Clean. Prod. 413, 137432 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Z., Felton, T. & Mostafavi, A. Interpretable machine learning for predicting urban flash flood hotspots using intertwined land and built-environment features. Computers, Environ. Urban Syst. 110, 102096 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z. et al. Revealing the differences of urban parks’ services to human wellbeing based upon social media data. Urban Forestry Urban Green. 63, 127233 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koohsari, M. J. et al. Mismatch between perceived and objectively measured land use mix and street connectivity: associations with neighborhood walking. J. Urban Health 92, 242–252 (2015).

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Arslan, E. S. & Kaymaz, I. Visitor perception of recreational ecosystem services and their role in landscape management of Gölcük Nature Park, Turkey. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 27, 202–213 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghermandi, A., Sinclair, M., Fichtman, E. & Gish, M. Novel insights on intensity and typology of direct human-nature interactions in protected areas through passive crowdsourcing. Glob. Environ. Change 65, 102189 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, S. & Han, F. Tourist Behavior Recognition Through Scenic Spot Image Retrieval Based on Image Processing. Traitement du Signal 37, 619–626 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spake, R. et al. Unpacking ecosystem service bundles: Towards predictive mapping of synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services. Glob. Environ. Change 47, 37–50 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Sun, X., Shan, R. & Wang, B. Mapping and assessing supply–demand matching of recreational ecosystem services in Shandong province, China. Ecol. Indic. 160, 111859 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, G. & Zhang, B. Identification of landscape character types for trans-regional integration in the Wuling Mountain multi-ethnic area of southwest China. Landsc. Urban Plan. 162, 25–35 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, T., Hui, E. C.-M., Lang, W. & Tao, L. People, recreational facility and physical activity: New-type urbanization planning for the healthy communities in China. Habitat Int. 58, 12–22 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchi, V., Marasco, A. & Apicerni, V. Sustainability communication of tourism cities: A text mining approach. Cities 143, 104590 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, R. et al. Social and ecological factors on the perception of cultural ecosystem services and disservices: Insights from Shanghai, China. Landsc. Urban Plan. 259, 105373 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schirpke, U., Meisch, C., Marsoner, T. & Tappeiner, U. Revealing spatial and temporal patterns of outdoor recreation in the European Alps and their surroundings. Ecosyst. Serv. 31, 336–350 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Girma, H. A. Factors shaping international tourist flows: Insights from a systematic study. J. Sustain. Tour., Hospitality, Manag. 11, 30–45 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoderer, B. M. et al. Identifying and mapping the tourists perception of cultural ecosystem services: A case study from an Alpine region. Land Use Policy 56, 251–261 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, N., Li, Y. & Liu, J. Broader applicability of the metacoupling framework than Tobler’s first law of geography for global sustainability: A systematic review. Geogr. Sustainability 4, 6–18 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, N. The Narrative Approach To Living Heritage. Protection of Cultural Heritage 126–138 (2021).

  • Nian, S., Li, D., Zhang, J., Lu, S. & Zhang, X. Stimulus-Organism-Response Framework: Is the Perceived Outstanding Universal Value Attractiveness of Tourists Beneficial to World Heritage Site Conservation?. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 20, 1189 (2023).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cord, A. F., Roeßiger, F. & Schwarz, N. Geocaching data as an indicator for recreational ecosystem services in urban areas: Exploring spatial gradients, preferences and motivations. Landsc. Urban Plan. 144, 151–162 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D., Brown, G., Liu, Y. & Mateo-Babiano, I. A comparison of perceived and geographic access to predict urban park use. Cities 42, 85–96 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachi, L., Ribeiro, S. C., Hermes, J. & Saadi, A. Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) in landscapes with a tourist vocation: Mapping and modeling the physical landscape components that bring benefits to people in a mountain tourist destination in southeastern Brazil. Tour. Manag. 77, 104017 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhalis, D., Leung, D. & Lin, M. Metaverse as a disruptive technology revolutionising tourism management and marketing. Tour. Manag. 97, 104724 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Would you really recommend it? Antecedents of word-of-mouth in medical tourism. Tourism Management 83, 104209 (2021).

  • Paracchini, M. L. et al. Mapping cultural ecosystem services: A framework to assess the potential for outdoor recreation across the EU. Ecol. Indic. 45, 371–385 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, F., Müller, F., Haase, D. & Fohrer, N. Rural–urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics. Land Use Policy 29, 521–535 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Canale, R. R., De Simone, E., Di Maio, A. & Parenti, B. UNESCO World Heritage sites and tourism attractiveness: The case of Italian provinces. Land Use Policy 85, 114–120 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih, H.-Y. Network characteristics of drive tourism destinations: An application of network analysis in tourism. Tour. Manag. 27, 1029–1039 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiaobin, M., Biao, S., Guolin, H., Xing, Z. & Li, L. Evaluation and spatial effects of tourism ecological security in the Yangtze River Delta. Ecol. Indic. 131, 108190 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, I. A., Golomidova, E. S. & Terenina, N. K. Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Change in Volume and Spatial Structure of the Tourist Flow in Finland and Estonia in 2020. Regional Res. Russ. 11, 361–366 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollenstein, L. & Purves, R. Exploring place through user-generated content: Using Flickr tags to describe city cores. J. Spat. Inf. Sci. 21, 48 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Peterson, G. D. & Bennett, E. M. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 5242–5247 (2010).

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *